5 main styles:
- Street surveys
- Shop surveys
- Hall tests - prebooked location, entice with giveaways, possibility for more complex displays (c. 10mins)
- Placement tests - test product in home over period, results in diary, costly and time consuming but realistic (recruit through omnibus surveys or street interviews)
- Home interviews / business surveys - can pre-arrange, often reluctant to respond
Enumerators deliver postal questionnaires, collects and helps with any difficult questions. Better response rates.

- Advantages: rapid response, standard sampling frame (tel directory), wide geographic area, easier to ask sensitive questions
- Disadvantages: biased sample (10% no phone, many ex-directory), high refusal rate, difficult to build rapport, must be short, not possible to show materials
- Design issues critical (include factors like processing speed, intuitive navigation)
- Can be generated dynamically in response to answers, skipping irrelevant sections automatically
- Web users may not be typical of target market?
- Difficult to establish sample frame
LABORATORY TESTS - measure responses to adverts, product descriptions, packaging. Controlled environment but difficult to isolate impact of factors.
FIELD TESTS - test in realistic surroundings over time. Expensive to produce in small quantities, risky as competitors may find.
- Home - and report by questionnaire
- Store - test packaging or POS material, results measured through sales figures
- Test marketing - try in ltd area of market to predict sales vol, profit, market share. Expensive but vital.
Omnibus surveys: master questionnaire run by market research org, space sold to orgs
Market Tracking Surveys: data on particular market using regular different samples, product usage data sometimes combined with media exposure data
IN-STORE TESTING - quick, inexpensive and good promotion
No comments:
Post a Comment